Altera Forum






Threads: 14,867
Posts: 60,241
Members: 22,503
Welcome to our newest member, lszyx344
User
Reputation
6344
5582
5301
2557
1830
1616
1496
1041
953
927




 
Register
Quick Search
 
  Altera Forums > Device and Tools Related > FPGA, Hardcopy, and CPLD Discussion

100G Virtual Lanes Number

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 19th, 2009, 06:52 AM
ethstud ethstud is offline
Altera Beginner
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 88
ethstud is on a distinguished road
Default 100G Virtual Lanes Number

Dear all, after reading the AN570 document on the implementation of the 40G/100G ETH protocol in Stratix IV devices, I have some doubts related on the number of internal Virtual Lanes (VLs). In the document Altera asserts that for the 100G solution, the internal data flow should be given to 20 VLs, while for the 40G solution only to 4 VLs.

The question is simply, why (when for 40G are only 4 VLs) and for 100G 10VLs are not enough? Is here not possible to connect only 10 VLs to 10 FIFOS and 10 Gearboxes, omitting the MUX/Demux?

In the white paper WP-01080-1.2 "Using 10-Gbps Transceivers in 40G/100G Applications", they explain this number as the least common multiple of the electrical (n=10) and PMD(m=?) lanes. But does not a single PMD lane correspond to one 10G transceiver? So in total only 10 10G Transceiver are required to implement a 100G link, leading therefore to a least common multiple of 10, i.e. 10 VLs.

Thank you for the support
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quartus in a virtual machine alt1000 Quartus II and EDA Tools Discussion 9 July 30th, 2008 10:56 AM
virtual FPGA mik General Altera Discussion 0 April 9th, 2008 10:24 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 PM.