COST vs WMT

Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

COST

58.4
AI Score
VS
COST Wins

WMT

58.2
AI Score

Investment Advisor Scores

COST

Mar 30, 2026
58score
Recommendation
HOLD

WMT

Mar 30, 2026
58score
Recommendation
HOLD

AI Analyst Insights

Detailed Metrics Comparison

Metric COST WMT Winner
Forward P/E 48.0769 40.3226 WMT
PEG Ratio 5.3991 4.4581 WMT
Revenue Growth 9.2% 5.6% COST
Earnings Growth 13.9% -19.0% COST
Tradestie Score 58.4/100 58.2/100 COST
Profit Margin 3.0% 3.1% WMT
Beta 1.00 1.00 Tie
Implied Volatility N/A N/A Tie
AI Recommendation HOLD HOLD Tie

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our detailed analysis, COST is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 3 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.

We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.

Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.