UMAC vs QCOM
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026
UMAC
QCOM
Investment Advisor Scores
QCOM
AI Analyst Insights
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | UMAC | QCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Valuation
Lower P/E and PEG ratios suggest a stock may be undervalued relative to earnings and growth. Value investors prefer lower multiples. |
|||
| Forward P/E | 0 | 13.1234 | Tie |
| PEG Ratio | 0 | 0.5353 | Tie |
|
Growth
Higher revenue and earnings growth rates indicate a company is expanding faster. Strong growth often justifies premium valuations. |
|||
| Revenue Growth | 39.4% | 10.0% | UMAC |
| Earnings Growth | 0.0% | 29.4% | QCOM |
|
Quality & Profitability
Higher Tradestie Score and profit margins reveal how efficiently a company operates. Strong profitability indicates competitive advantages. |
|||
| Tradestie Score | 54.1/100 | 53.9/100 | UMAC |
| Profit Margin | 0.0% | 12.5% | QCOM |
|
Risk Profile
Lower Beta and Implied Volatility values indicate reduced market risk. Conservative investors favor stocks with less price volatility. |
|||
| Beta | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
|
Sentiment
AI Recommendation reflects overall analyst and proprietary sentiment. Stronger recommendations signal higher conviction. |
|||
| AI Recommendation | HOLD | HOLD | Tie |