CFG vs MTB
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Jul 05, 2026
CFG
65.2
AI Score
VS
CFG Wins
MTB
62.9
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | CFG | MTB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 418.00M | 2.17B | CFG |
| Net Income | 664.00M | 517.00M | MTB |
| Net Margin | 158.9% | 23.8% | MTB |
| ROE | 2.4% | 2.0% | MTB |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.2% | MTB |
| Total Assets | 214.74B | 227.92B | CFG |
| Debt/Equity | 0.40 | 0.47 | MTB |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, CFG is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 2 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.