MUSA vs AN
Head-to-Head Stock Analysis & Investment Rating
Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026
MUSA
60.6
AI Score
VS
AN Wins
AN
61.0
AI Score
Investment Advisor Scores
AI Analyst Insights
AI insights temporarily unavailable
Detailed Metrics Comparison
| Metric | MUSA | AN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 7.07B | 20.70B | AN |
| Net Income | 51.80M | 477.00M | AN |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 2.3% | AN |
| Operating Income | 142.10M | 926.00M | AN |
| ROE | 7.5% | 19.0% | AN |
| ROA | 2.3% | 3.4% | AN |
| Total Assets | 2.29B | 14.20B | AN |
| Cash | 71.90M | 97.60M | AN |
| Current Ratio | 0.98 | 0.79 | MUSA |
Frequently Asked Questions
Based on our detailed analysis, AN is currently the stronger investment candidate, winning 8 of the key financial metrics based on our comprehensive scoring model.
We analyze revenue and earnings growth rates in the "Growth" section above. Generally, the company with higher year-over-year revenue and EPS growth is fostering better expansion. Check the table above for the specific growth percentages.
Valuation is determined by metrics like the P/E Ratio and PEG Ratio. A lower P/E typically suggests a stock is cheaper relative to its earnings. Refer to the "Valuation" section in our comparison table to see which stock currently trades at a more attractive multiple.